prodoggle.org

The country’s future has been wagered on a dark horse. If Obama, Romney, or Perry wins, we lose. Bachmann and Gingrich appear to be non starters and it’s unlikely that Palin will run. Would Cain or Santorum make a good president? Forget the rest of the pack. Even Ron Paul has too many hangups to be considered reliable. Will someone come from behind?

You may think that replacing Obama will be great for the country. That may be so, but the only way out of this mess is to elect a tea party congress. Only a congress that adheres to the Constitution and requires the other officials of government to do likewise can save us. It is congress that makes the rules we live by (or lets others dictate to us).

The president is just an administrator of congress’ will under the Constitution. Likewise the judges are just to see that we get a fair shake from the government. They have no Constitutional authority to amend the supreme law of the land or make their own laws. It is the duty of the tea parties, this organization, and publications like the Patriot Post to see that the taxpayers are educated to vote for an AMERICAN congress. They can then remove those driving us to ruin from power.

The presidency is a popularity contest. He is elected by the majority. To get re-elected he must remain popular with the majority. Congress must also hold him responsible for the rights of all the people. The judges must also be held responsible to their oath of office.

I hold each of you reading this to be responsible for voting for AMERICAN candidates for federal, state, and local office. Your freedom, your economic well being, and, yes, your very welfare depend on it.
Front Page

By Thomas Sowell
If anything, “the rich” have far more options for putting their money beyond the reach of the tax collectors today than they had back in 1921. In addition to being able to put their money into tax-exempt securities, the rich today can easily send millions — or billions — of dollars to foreign countries, with the ease of electronic transfers in a globalized economy.

In other words, the genuinely rich are likely to be the least harmed by high tax rates in the top brackets. People who are looking for jobs are likely to be the most harmed, because they cannot equally easily transfer themselves overseas to take the jobs that are being created there by American investments that are fleeing from high tax rates at home.

Small businesses — hardware stores, gas stations or restaurants for example — are likewise unable to transfer themselves overseas. So they are far more likely to be unable to escape the higher tax rates that are supposedly being imposed on “millionaires and billionaires,” as President Obama puts it. Moreover, small businesses are what create most of the new jobs.

As for the 1920s, Mellon eventually got his way, getting Congress to bring the top tax rate down from 73 percent to 24 percent. Vast sums of money that had seemingly vanished into thin air suddenly reappeared in the economy, creating far more jobs and far more tax revenue for the government.

Sometimes sanity eventually prevails. But not always.
Front Page

By Ann Coulter
Liberals are on their high horses about a single audience member at CNN’s Republican debate whom they believe wanted a hypothetical man without health insurance in a hypothetical coma to die — hypothetically.

(Democrats want people in comas to die only when they are not hypothetical but real, like Terri Schiavo.)

I concur with the audience member who shouted “Yes!” This has nothing to do with any actual people in comas — the people Democrats want to kill — it’s just a big “screw you” to the moderator.
Front Page

The Oath Accountability Civil Action to Restore Constitutional Integrity

To enforce our Constitution’s limits on the central government, we believe a formal legal action is necessary. This action, if successful, would require that all members of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches, first and foremost, abide by their oaths “to support and defend” our Constitution, under penalty of law, and comport with its enumerated limitations on the federal government. The current scope of federal activities provides abundant evidence that many members of those three co-equal branches have long since abandoned their oaths, and, at present, there is no recourse for prosecution to enforce compliance.

Continue reading →

Front Page

Front Page

Front Page

By Mark Steyn
And so we commemorate an act of war as a “tragic event,” and we retreat to equivocation, cultural self-loathing, and utterly fraudulent misrepresentation about the events of the day. In the weeks after 9/11, Americans were enjoined to ask “Why do they hate us?” A better question is: “Why do they despise us?” And the quickest way to figure out the answer is to visit the Peace Quilt and the Wish Tree, the Crescent of Embrace and the Hole of Bureaucratic Inertia.
Front Page

This column was first published on Sept. 12, 2001, and received an extraordinary response from readers worldwide. It’s likely the most read column in the English language on 9/11.-Read
Front Page

By Michelle Malkin
The post-9/11 problem isn’t whether we’ll forget. The problem is: Will we ever learn?
Front Page