prodoggle.org

“In Washington, D.C., America is witnessing one of the grossest spectacles of fiscal incompetency, coupled with denial, ever perpetrated by a political party. And that’s the Republicans. Democrats have made it clear that they will accept nothing less than the destruction of the republic, if that’s what it take to prove progressivism is ‘successful.’ Over the top? Consider this: the highest cut in the federal budget proposed by the Irresponsible Republicans is $61 billion. The Democrat Destroyers say such a cut is way over the top. Last month, in 28 days, our government spent $223 billion of money we don’t have. That’s nearly four times more than the cuts proposed by the Irresponsibles, every one of which will be fought tooth and nail by the Destroyers. Any questions? I have one. At what point does this eyes-wide-open effort to bankrupt America reach the boiling point with the American public? If someone came into your house and ‘borrowed’ a little over seven hundred bucks — per family member — I bet most Americans would be pretty upset. Well try dividing $233 billion in borrowed money by 300 million Americans, and guess what: that’s precisely what the Obama administration added to every citizen’s share of the debt — in one month.” –columnist Arnold Ahlert
Front Page

A lot of folks can’t understand how we came to have an oil shortage here in our country.
~~~
Well, there’s a very simple answer.
~~~
Continue reading →

Once again we’ve had trouble finding news for the site. The important news was on the lamestream media. On the conservative side there was talk about O’Obama doing nothing in the Middle East or meddling in the affairs of the same. Give me a break. You don’t have to give him a break, he certainly doesn’t deserve it. But don’t embarass me with your foolishness.

Then there’s the same ol’, same ol’ about racism by the left. Why talk about it? It’s really about those who worked hard to succeed and those who lay back and whine. Those are the people the liberals love. They aren’t for colored people, they are for people who chose to be losers.

And who doesn’t know that socialists and moslems are the enemies of our Constitutional Republic? That’s been getting a lot of blather lately. I hope Americans already knew that and those opposed to America don’t care.

Gas. Oil. Talk, talk, talk.

And who doesn’t know that you would be sitting in the slammer for flouting the laws the way O’Obama’s crew does? Is there any of them (except, possibly, the hated Hillary) who hasn’t been convicted of something? Or at least been found to be an accomplice? Nobody’s doing anything about it, so why yak it up?

How many of you have a stack of gov’t savings bonds? The gov’t spent the money you paid for them, so you don’t get the money back. Besides, you’d get more than you paid for them. You’re stealing from your grandchildren. It’s a pyramid scheme. Sound like Social Security? No difference. Sounds like O’Obama’s “investment” in America though, doesn’t it?

If we don’t put anything on our front page, it means we haven’t found any news. But you can always click on our Blogroll links for new opinions. And you can always let us know if we have missed anything.
Front Page

By Ann Coulter
Fine, we understand that Wisconsin public sector employees like the system that pays them an average of $76,500 per year, with splendiferous benefits, and are fighting like wildcats against any proposed reforms to that system. But it’s madness to keep treating people who are promoting their own self-interest as if they are James Meredith walking into the University of Mississippi.
More
Front Page

Paraphrasing the noted economist and philosopher F.A. Hayek, Future Freedom Foundation President Jacob Hornberger wrote, “There is no difference in principle, between the economic philosophy of Nazism, socialism, communism, and fascism and that of the American welfare state and regulated economy.”

Not only is there no economic distinction between socialist systems in different political wrappers, ultimately there is no consequential societal distinction between Marxist Socialism, Nationalist Socialism, or the most recent incarnation of this beast, Democratic Socialism. The conclusion of socialism by any name, once it has replaced Rule of Law with the rule of men, is tyranny.
More
by mike

Brilliant in its simplicity…………….

A. Back off and let those men who want to marry men, marry men.

B. Allow those women who want to marry women, marry women.

C. Allow those folks who want to abort their babies, abort their babies.

D. In three generations, there will be no Democrats.

Just Damn – I love it when a plan comes together
More
Front Page

WOW! Here’s a video that I guarantee you won’t forget anytime soon! She didn’t cry, although she came close to losing it, and she gave those a reality check they dearly needed.
Texas girl, Judy Dorsett Tyler, had the encroachment on her second amendment rights so graphically illustrated. The honorable senator from New York , Chuck Schumer, was getting a little uncomfortable in his chair.

The room was absolutely dead quiet throughout her testimony and the gun banners (meaning Senators who want to BAN citizens’ ownership of all guns)
absolutely speechless as this little Texas gal chews them up and spits them out.

She knows what the 2nd amendment is really all about. Watch it.

You will be glad you did. And please pass it
along. ‘Click’ on link below.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4069761537893819675

Front Page

By Thomas Sowell
The biggest myth about labor unions is that unions are for the workers. Unions are for unions, just as corporations are for corporations and politicians are for politicians.

Nothing shows the utter cynicism of the unions and the politicians who do their bidding like the so-called “Employee Free Choice Act” that the Obama administration tried to push through Congress. Employees’ free choice as to whether or not to join a union is precisely what that legislation would destroy.
More
Front Page

By Ann Coulter
But government employees aren’t exactly like the mob. At least the Mafia guys have a strong work ethic.
More
Front Page

by Peg Luksik
The Pennsylvania State Senate is currently debating a new school choice bill. Among its provisions, the bill would create a state board to administer funds, called opportunity scholarships, to enable some children to attend an educational institution other than the public school of the district in which those children reside.

The bill begins with “legislative findings”, or statements of the basic principles upon which the language of the proposed law will be based. The findings stipulate that “Parents are best suited to choose the most appropriate means of education for their school-age children. Providing diverse educational opportunities for the children of this Commonwealth is a civic and civil rights imperative and a matter of serious concern.”

If those sentences are correct, and it is a civil rights issue to make sure that parents have the ability to choose the most appropriate means to educate their children, then the language of the bill should reflect that sentiment. It should include all parents, because if something is actually a civil right, it cannot legitimately be denied to some and given to others by an act of government.

If the government can determine who is accorded a right, and who is not, then the “right” in question is no longer a right – it is a privilege.
More
Front Page

By Dennis Prager
I will end with the subject with which I began — the Vietnamese. It is impossible to visit Vietnam and not be impressed by the people. I hope I live to see the day when the people of Vietnam, freed from the communist lies that still permeate their daily lives, understand that every Vietnamese death in the war against America was a wasted life, one more of the 140 million human sacrifices on the altar of the most bloodthirsty false god in history: communism.
More
Front Page